As duped person enamored by his(Dr. Fung’s) strategy, I may have been blind to some of his con like suppositions. I always am willing to learn. Can you please remind or identify for me some of the idiotic claims?
Well there were two things in the post I responded to. Specifically,
1. The idea that there is anyone out there that claims 1200 kcal/day is sufficient for a maintenance diet for an adult. Literally no one is claiming this, yet he just lies and says it’s the dogma. I’m not sure what the “dogma” is. But that’s definitely not it. So he fabricates a claim, represents it as “dogma” and then attacks it. It’s intellectually dishonest and should be obvious to anyone.
2. He then goes on to claim that he was gaining weight on 1200 kcal a day despite exercising. Even the most fervent Fung believer has to know that’s clearly impossible. It’s an obviously false claim. Do you believe it?
I can understand being “duped” by him. I’ve repeatedly said his strategy works. That’s not the problem.
I never knew he claimed that people were gaining weight on 1200 cal. I don’t think you can gain weight on 1200 cal/day.
Lots of my patients claim to eat “nothing” and still gain weight. Unless you measure portions carefully most have no idea how much they consume. I think the obesity epidemic has little to do with insulin levels and more to do with a lack of self control rampant in our society.
disagree, the more i learn about obesity the more I realize it is not about self control or lack thereof. There are a whole host of neurohormonal, and biological mechanisms in play which work to promote weight regain after weight loss. to say the obesity epidemic is about a lack of self control is intellectually lazy.
Comment