My medical school embryology professor, who studied this for a living, told us that at least 70% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, and he thought the real number was even much higher. It's just that most women don't know that they were ever even pregnant when they miscarry, especially if it occurs at about the same time as their normal period - which very often happens.
When my first daughter was born, we were pretty relaxed about the whole thing and my wife never checked a pregnancy test until she was clearly pregnant. As far as we know, she never had a miscarriage back then but she also never really checked.
This time around, due to other reasons, we're a lot more anxious. She starts checking a highly sensitive pregnancy test, daily, at about 3 weeks (1 week prior to the expected period). She has had 4 positive pregnancy tests that turned positive the day, or sometimes even just hours, before miscarriage bleeding. If she had not tested repeatedly before her expected period, she would have had no idea that she was ever even pregnant for any of them. We would have assumed that she just never got pregnant and was having her normal period. Workup for causes of repeated miscarriage have been negative.
Has anyone else had a similar experience?
My point is that early miscarriage rates are going to be highly influenced by how often and how early you test, and also with the sensitivity of the test. Also, the user needs to realize that a faintly positive pregnancy test is still positive. All these factors are going to be hard to control for in a study of surgeons vs non-physicians.
When my first daughter was born, we were pretty relaxed about the whole thing and my wife never checked a pregnancy test until she was clearly pregnant. As far as we know, she never had a miscarriage back then but she also never really checked.
This time around, due to other reasons, we're a lot more anxious. She starts checking a highly sensitive pregnancy test, daily, at about 3 weeks (1 week prior to the expected period). She has had 4 positive pregnancy tests that turned positive the day, or sometimes even just hours, before miscarriage bleeding. If she had not tested repeatedly before her expected period, she would have had no idea that she was ever even pregnant for any of them. We would have assumed that she just never got pregnant and was having her normal period. Workup for causes of repeated miscarriage have been negative.
Has anyone else had a similar experience?
My point is that early miscarriage rates are going to be highly influenced by how often and how early you test, and also with the sensitivity of the test. Also, the user needs to realize that a faintly positive pregnancy test is still positive. All these factors are going to be hard to control for in a study of surgeons vs non-physicians.
Comment