I would say that unfortunately many of the systems are not fair and open – marginalized groups face inherent barriers to entry in many professions. If the playing field was even and there were no internal biases or systematic discrimination then this wouldn’t be an issue. But the problem is that it is not a level playing field for people in marginalized groups so I would argue that the only way to ensure a process that is fair and open is to first address the outcome. If you address the outcome and identify the systematic issues only then will your result be one that is fair and open.
You are making an assertion of broad based discrimination in many professions. The onus is on you to provide some evidence for that claim. Lack of equal outcomes is not evidence that the process is unfair or biased.
Comment