So Senate adds in the repeal of the Individual Mandate because somehow, by requiring less people on the exchange costs less.
So by NOT forcing the young healthy to buy insurance, the government saves money? How's that argument help where they said the young healthy are needed to balance the premiums?
This is the whole reason why they wanted to tackle the Health Reform; to get all those savings to use on the Tax Reform bill instead of hitting that 1.5 Trillion marker. It looks like some serious math wizardry with the individual mandate repeal.
Any CBO experts here?
So by NOT forcing the young healthy to buy insurance, the government saves money? How's that argument help where they said the young healthy are needed to balance the premiums?
This is the whole reason why they wanted to tackle the Health Reform; to get all those savings to use on the Tax Reform bill instead of hitting that 1.5 Trillion marker. It looks like some serious math wizardry with the individual mandate repeal.
Any CBO experts here?
Comment