Originally posted by resident_1
View Post
X
-
Some is what people need, and I think a good deal of what people are told they need by car manufacturers. Car manufacturers are good at selling the idea of a car, and the lifestyle that comes along with it. Take out 7year loan, pay tons of money for that 14mpg fuel costs. Keep up with other neighbours, coworkers, sport parents.
All effort is to sell as many cars as possible and make as much money. Doesn't matter if most people will be fine with smaller and affordable cars, gotta sell that Expedition, Suburban, F150, etc.
Originally posted by CordMcNally View Post
They manufacturer what people want to buy. That's why they're working on large electric vehicles.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Molar Mechanic View PostThe fate of EV is already sealed. They will dominate new car sales in short order. The limiting factor is battery production, and cost. Time will take care of both of those. Battery cost has reduced 90% in the past 10 years in a fledgling industry.
The only thing that will get me out my Tesla is a decent truck. I have pre-orders for Cyber and Rivian. I was an F-150 guy prior to the Tesla. I don't miss my truck all that often, but when I do miss it I really do miss it a lot.
I've towed with a Model Y a fair bit, and I'd agree with range dropping by nearly half. Some of that is aerodynamics, which will be less of an issue for a truck (they are already not aerodynamic), and some is weight, which will always reduce range.
The next gen batteries and chargers will have parity with gas for fill time. Once those are prodigious, then only non-typical cases like WCI will remain a challenge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tim View PostFour drivers in the family I think (or soon to be).
The house is wired for recharging. How many of you vehicles are using them or running on gas?
Just a question.
Besides, have you tried to get a new car lately? I have. It's impossible.Helping those who wear the white coat get a fair shake on Wall Street since 2011
Comment
-
Originally posted by resident_1 View PostSome is what people need, and I think a good deal of what people are told they need by car manufacturers. Car manufacturers are good at selling the idea of a car, and the lifestyle that comes along with it. Take out 7year loan, pay tons of money for that 14mpg fuel costs. Keep up with other neighbours, coworkers, sport parents.
All effort is to sell as many cars as possible and make as much money. Doesn't matter if most people will be fine with smaller and affordable cars, gotta sell that Expedition, Suburban, F150, etc.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by The White Coat Investor View Post
Four drivers, but how many commuters? Maybe one. Maybe. And that ends in 3 weeks.
Besides, have you tried to get a new car lately? I have. It's impossible.
From a market acceptance viewpoint, zero EVs currently owned.
Miles driven for daily living in my view count as “commuter”. Personal miles are not deductible, but they are still miles. If one needs a vehicle, they go some place.
If EVs are to be successful they need the dominant form of transportation.
By no means do I see anyone buying 4 F150’s.
Not there yet, for cars or light trucks.
F150 is a big real world test of market acceptance.
Full disclosure: I don’t own a pickup or an EV.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The White Coat Investor View PostBut commuters? Beyond me why anyone with a daily commute doesn't already have an electric.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by resident_1 View Post
Our entire way of life (i mean suburban) is built on consumption and is unsustainable.
This inflation and once gas hit $4 nationwide made this obvious.
Tim -The issue on the F150 EV won't be acceptance -- it'll be how much can/willing to produce? The trouble with legacy companies are several fold. Chief among them is franchising makes their living on service. New sales is really a small portion. Dealerships KNOW this. GM Bolt is a prime example where never advertised, yet still sold quite well despite no significant push/promo for it by dealerships. --Just like real estate brokers don't mention Redfin/Zillow -- ever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StarTrekDoc View Posthappened in the 1970s. now again 2022s --- pretty good cycle in between. 70s were a lot worse than now too and same doomsday predictions.
Tim -The issue on the F150 EV won't be acceptance -- it'll be how much can/willing to produce? The trouble with legacy companies are several fold. Chief among them is franchising makes their living on service. New sales is really a small portion. Dealerships KNOW this. GM Bolt is a prime example where never advertised, yet still sold quite well despite no significant push/promo for it by dealerships. --Just like real estate brokers don't mention Redfin/Zillow -- ever.
The dealership network is a distribution issue. With new cars, financing and dealer opinions are the “profit”. Service is problematic with EVs. Trade ins and used cars are also legacy. No clue , but the Bolt sold < 25k for 2021. What ad budget would make sense? 726k F150s in 2021. There is a reason Bolt wasn’t advertised. The Ford MachE outsold the Bolt in 2021 by 10%. (27k). Of course Ford wants scarcity. Supply chain issues all over. But the success of the F150 is still significant in the speed of transition to EVs.
Tesla Model Y was the top EV seller in USA, 170k in 2021.
F150 is a big big dog. Consumer acceptance of this transition will impact all models. I think Ford had a plan. Mustang MachE, debug. F-150 debug, then build to scale. I agree supplies will be constrained. My gut seems to be Ford is gauging the appetite of the public to switch to EVs.
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment