Originally posted by Dont_know_mind
View Post
X
-
Originally posted by afan View PostYou could probably get some free advice by calling your current malpractice carrier or broker. Ask whether there is any insurance needed or even available.
If someone were to sue you for defamation for saying that their care was substandard, then your umbrella should cover you. The same, I assume, if the other side were to sue you for saying that the care was appropriate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AR View Post
If you're afraid of this, why aren't you afraid of an unhappy patient doing the same thing? (not you specifically).
I used to do some medicolegal, but I don't anymore.
I definitely look out for this in patients I treat as well.
In the past, I treated a patient with paranoid personality PD who sent me threatening letters for about 2 years. At one stage I would get daily variably threatening mail and even parked a block away from where I worked for a few weeks.
I don't treat anyone I think could be a personal risk anymore.
Probably some people get through a clinical career without any problems and also lots of medicolegal probably.
Comment
-
As a risk/malpractice manager of 39 years experience, you do not need malpractice insurance if you are giving expert opinions or testimony based only on chart review and indeed your typical malpractice policy would not cover you for expert work. If you are doing independent medical exams or evaluations, you do need malpractice insurance, since that is typically considered patient care. I have handled a couple of claims over the years in which it was alleged the clinician doing an IME failed to inform the patient about a significant finding (one was a malignant melanoma and the other was a lesion on a chest film). I settled both of those cases.
- Likes 1
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment