Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Questions for the surgeons.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Zaphod View Post

    I agree with pan, we take zero effort to assure any kind of competency or quality or assurance of any kind whatsoever.
    Shouldn’t even considering being the president of the US be an automatic disqualifier?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by CordMcNally View Post

      Shouldn’t even considering being the president of the US be an automatic disqualifier?
      Agree! Cord for president! Whos with me..

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Tim View Post

        Only two problems:
        1. Agreement on the criteria and testing.
        (Examples: SAT’s, MCAT’s, Step tests).
        2. Finding two sane individuals that would even consider the job. (the damage to family and life is devastating)..
        I look forward to your screening standards.
        (For example: female and person of color has been used). This should be a classic.
        ensuring they can dress themselves or have enough attention to hold a conversation would likely be a step up from what we are seeing/have seen, again in the last two.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Panscan View Post

          ensuring they can dress themselves or have enough attention to hold a conversation would likely be a step up from what we are seeing/have seen, again in the last two.
          Tell me again how we pick these candidates? It makes no sense. We are guaranteed to not pick the "best". The best of bad alternatives? Democracy is messy.

          Comment

          Working...
          X