Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Medical Discussion of Coronavirus

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by K82

    NY and NJ instituted mask mandates in early/mid April: NJ April 6 and NY April 17. I think you would have to start your count at that time if you want to determine mask mandate effectiveness.

    I still hold to my contention that if mask mandates were such a game changer, than why do the charts of all the states show no huge differences between states that were strict and those that weren't?
    They were a game changer for people who would otherwise not have been able to ride the bus or go to the grocery store. They cut transmission in schools significantly, w which allowed kids with immunocompromised family members to attend in person.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by snowcanyon

      They were a game changer for people who would otherwise not have been able to ride the bus or go to the grocery store. They cut transmission in schools significantly, w which allowed kids with immunocompromised family members to attend in person.
      I don't think you can say that as fact when there are no studies that show conclusively it's true, and like I keep saying, the charts from the past two years don't show any significant difference in cases or deaths between states that had strict mask mandate laws and those that didn't.

      I personally believe that the masks did/do more harm in kids in school by far than help. Language development, facial expressions, being able to understand what the teacher is saying, are not insignificant issues. Also, we are creating a whole generation of mental health phobias in all these kids who are being led to believe they have to wear a mask or risk death to themselves or others.

      Comment


      • The other thing I find curious about the mask mandate is that we have a bunch of liberal states doing away with the mandate right now, even though the current death rate is still higher than it was last summer as well as in the fall of 2020. Why is that? Could it be due to the fact that the public is seeing that it doesn't really make a difference and they have had enough of it, and the mid term elections are coming? How else do you explain this change in policy as it relates to data on the ground?

        How is the nation faring against COVID-19, both overall and at a state level? Get the answers here, with data on hotspots and infection rates. This map tracks the history of coronavirus cases in America, both recent and all-time.

        Comment


        • And yet another interesting fact regarding Covid comparisons between countries is the data for Sweden compared to the US. This site is very useful for comparing any country you want for a multitude of parameters:

          Sweden: What has been the impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)?


          This thing I find interesting is that the death rate in the US was much worse over the course of the pandemic than it was in Sweden. Also, the curves for the cases was very similar despite Sweden rejecting any lock downs or mask mandates. They were widely ridiculed for this approach. Was this due to other factors in that country? Maybe. But it does cause one to pause and wonder if any of these severe protective measures did anything to decrease the death rate in the US.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by K82
            And yet another interesting fact regarding Covid comparisons between countries is the data for Sweden compared to the US. This site is very useful for comparing any country you want for a multitude of parameters:

            Sweden: What has been the impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)?


            This thing I find interesting is that the death rate in the US was much worse over the course of the pandemic than it was in Sweden. Also, the curves for the cases was very similar despite Sweden rejecting any lock downs or mask mandates. They were widely ridiculed for this approach. Was this due to other factors in that country? Maybe. But it does cause one to pause and wonder if any of these severe protective measures did anything to decrease the death rate in the US.
            And how did Sweden compare to its immediate Scandinavian neighbors?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by K82
              Another insanity that is driving me crazy is making all US citizens test negative for Covid to get back into our country when flying home. This is insane. Its not for the safety of the other passengers on the plane because I can get on the plane in the US without a negative test to fly out of the country. Its not to protect our countries border from bringing Covid into the US because I can drive into the US in a car without a negative Covid test. Can anyone explain to me the logic behind this?
              I don't think there is any logic behind it. It's another example of covid policy without any good scientific basis.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by K82
                Why is that? Could it be due to the fact that the public is seeing that it doesn't really make a difference and they have had enough of it, and the mid term elections are coming?

                https://usafacts.org/visualizations/...19-spread-map/
                Winner, winner, chicken dinner.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by HikingDO
                  Winner, winner, chicken dinner.
                  Perversely, the government clearly is in the business of picking winners and losers.

                  The data shows, the pilots union is a definite “loser” as compared to the teachers unions.
                  The science is easy to understand. Almost most of the mandates and enforcement starts out under the expansion of “emergency powers”.
                  Politically, our country has been operating under “declared political emergencies” since 2016.

                  Ironically, if Dr. Jill had been a pilot, the skies might be free of vaccine or mask mandates. If Dr Jill or Hunter would have been a petroleum engineer, the US might have a different slant on fossil fuels. If Hunter had grown up in west Texas in the oil business, immigration and energy policies might be different.

                  Emergency powers are discretionary, tend to be abused. COVID no longer is an emergency. It is a potential danger, but not a surprise. Now it is clearly a political tool. Our government is resisting losing it, not for emergencies or public benefit, political benefits are so much easier under “emergency powers” and mandates.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by K82
                    The other thing I find curious about the mask mandate is that we have a bunch of liberal states doing away with the mandate right now, even though the current death rate is still higher than it was last summer as well as in the fall of 2020. Why is that? Could it be due to the fact that the public is seeing that it doesn't really make a difference and they have had enough of it, and the mid term elections are coming? How else do you explain this change in policy as it relates to data on the ground?

                    https://usafacts.org/visualizations/...19-spread-map/
                    Midterm elections is one facet sure - a politician's goal is to be re-elected, so why would that be surprising? On the flip side, that's the same reason DeSantis ignored all the science and did what his anti-vax/mask constituents wanted - it's how the game is played.

                    Other factors could be the vax rate in the US is higher, and the overall death rate for the variant is low.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by FIREshrink

                      And how did Sweden compare to its immediate Scandinavian neighbors?
                      Interesting enough, Norway and Finland did much better than Sweden in the last two peaks but Sweden is currently doing much better than the other two. Sweden has done much better than the UK or US throughout the pandemic. I have no idea how restrictive Norway and Finland have been.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by K82

                        Interesting enough, Norway and Finland did much better than Sweden in the last two peaks but Sweden is currently doing much better than the other two. Sweden has done much better than the UK or US throughout the pandemic. I have no idea how restrictive Norway and Finland have been.
                        Sweden has had 1765 deaths per million population

                        Finland : 501
                        Norway: 495

                        I mean, there's no comparison at all. My question was rhetorical.

                        Comment


                        • ​I have no idea if masks work or not to decrease COVID infections. I suspect there's benefit to decreasing viral load - even if it ends up being a small decrease - but I can't find data that's clearly convincing. And that's a really hard study to design well and carry out. What is obvious to me is that the initial lockdown period was critically important. Do y'all not remember the crazy ************************ we were doing? Intubate anyone who fails 6lpm by nasal cannula? Intubate in a box? Extubate under plastic shower curtains? Split a vent between two patients? Split a bipap between 2 patients? ************************ WBD wrote a very thoughtful and moving post about the weight he carried having to plan for rationing care. We needed a month or two to breathe and figure out how to handle this disease. We didn't know what we were doing - and that's understandable. Now vents are never the limiting factor - and that's not because Ford produced a bunch. We don't use them very often and for good reason.

                          Forcing everyone to stay home had tons of negative effects, granted. But if we hadn't paused and figured out what to do we would have had hundreds of thousands more deaths all from our ignorance. Oh, and I don't see how you can look at Scandinavia and not see that some combination of measures must have worked. I included Denmark bc it has much higher pop density - and a less isolated location - but still has similar demographics for comparison. If you're interested - besides pop density (Sweden = 1.6x Norway), they're incredibly similar (demographics, genetics, immunization rates, etc) but Norway took a much more cautious approach.

                          All that said, now that we're well immunized, it's time to move on. I just hate hearing this revisionist garbage when y'all were there and must have noticed that slowing the spread for a couple months allowed us to learn and adapt during a critical time.


                          Click image for larger version

Name:	COVID Cases.jpg
Views:	363
Size:	214.3 KB
ID:	325501

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	COVID_Death.jpg
Views:	328
Size:	251.0 KB
ID:	325502

                          Comment


                          • “All that said, now that we're well immunized, it's time to move on. I just hate hearing this revisionist garbage when y'all were there and must have noticed that slowing the spread for a couple months allowed us to learn and adapt during a critical time.”

                            As a non-physician and hopefully to all, the “lowering the curve” period was absolutely needed.
                            With any medical transmission:
                            Prevention (vaccines) and treatment are the only viable solutions. Coronavirus was not going away.
                            CDC lost it’s way (for whatever reason). CDC INTENTIONALLY ignored and actually withheld information as well as “messaged” misleading information.
                            First, all masks are not equal. Only N95 protect both the spread and exposure. This was a known at the outset. Rationing was absolutely necessary. What happened to phase 2? Crickets. To this day, cloth or paper or surgical are all the same. They are not. Mandating ineffective or less than optimal masks is lunacy. I cringe when I see “a mask protects you and spreading this to your loved ones”. That is a misrepresentation to this day.
                            Second, impact of immunity from prior infection.
                            Third, data on need for a booster not being released. Still not released for something like 20-50.
                            You see, scientists and the public might not agree with their desired recommendations. Too dumb.
                            Fourth, timing of changes. Not based upon new data. Based on other influences.

                            I think once vaccines and treatments became available, the emergency was over. It is not revisionist, the CDC is still making the same mistakes, all 4 above. Not objective or based on science, simply influenced by other factors. Many conflicting guidances as well. Like asymptomatic need for isolation. Imagine a positive teacher being told to go to work? But it is great for nurse or doctor? Geez, I guess some diseases impact people based on occupation. And a cloth or paper mask protects no one. They should have stayed in their lane. Advice on coronavirus, not occupation or economic cost/benefit.
                            Lowering the curve, vaccines and treatments solved the pandemic.
                            Tons of CYA going on, not just with Covid.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by PedsCCM
                              ​I have no idea if masks work or not to decrease COVID infections. I suspect there's benefit to decreasing viral load - even if it ends up being a small decrease - but I can't find data that's clearly convincing. And that's a really hard study to design well and carry out. What is obvious to me is that the initial lockdown period was critically important. Do y'all not remember the crazy ************************ we were doing? Intubate anyone who fails 6lpm by nasal cannula? Intubate in a box? Extubate under plastic shower curtains? Split a vent between two patients? Split a bipap between 2 patients? ************************ WBD wrote a very thoughtful and moving post about the weight he carried having to plan for rationing care. We needed a month or two to breathe and figure out how to handle this disease. We didn't know what we were doing - and that's understandable. Now vents are never the limiting factor - and that's not because Ford produced a bunch. We don't use them very often and for good reason.

                              Forcing everyone to stay home had tons of negative effects, granted. But if we hadn't paused and figured out what to do we would have had hundreds of thousands more deaths all from our ignorance. Oh, and I don't see how you can look at Scandinavia and not see that some combination of measures must have worked. I included Denmark bc it has much higher pop density - and a less isolated location - but still has similar demographics for comparison. If you're interested - besides pop density (Sweden = 1.6x Norway), they're incredibly similar (demographics, genetics, immunization rates, etc) but Norway took a much more cautious approach.

                              All that said, now that we're well immunized, it's time to move on. I just hate hearing this revisionist garbage when y'all were there and must have noticed that slowing the spread for a couple months allowed us to learn and adapt during a critical time.


                              Click image for larger version

Name:	COVID Cases.jpg
Views:	363
Size:	214.3 KB
ID:	325501

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	COVID_Death.jpg
Views:	328
Size:	251.0 KB
ID:	325502
                              I don't disagree with you that the start of this whole thing was very stressful and we did the best we could with what we knew. The landscape was constantly changing and we adjusted. But, that being said, I think we can look back now and say that some of the stuff we thought was game changing was likely not doing much. We can stop that now.

                              I just found out that Norway and Finland had similar lax mask mandate policies to Sweden so I don't know that you can make much of the differences: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2...mask-adoption/

                              Its tough to adjust for all the variables between places. But that being said, I still think that if masks were a game changer then we would see stark differences between states and countries that used strict mandates from those that didn't and we don't see it.

                              Comment


                              • WCICON24 EarlyBird
                                Omicron BA.2 seems to be on the rise - people speculating possible wave in April-Summer in US.

                                It seems to be 30% more infectious than BA.1, but has similar levels of morbidity.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎