Originally posted by StarTrekDoc
View Post
- Is “immunity” the key point and can it be adequately tested?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/directo...infection/amp/
This is very carefully worded (which it should be but also leaves many statements and conclusions with substantial unknowns).
“Whatever the underlying reasons turn out to be, it’s important to consider that humans are routinely infected and re-infected with other common coronaviruses, which are responsible for the common cold.” This is so weak of an argument for vaccinating previously infected individuals.
Some studies lead to different conclusions. Just because a vaccine offers protection against some variants, does not equate to better. Maybe it does.
Disclosure: I read this report as an attempt at messaging in favor requiring vaccinations of previously infected persons.
That actually requires substantial costs, efforts in particular globally as well as in the USA. Using Moderna (17 yrs+) gives me pause as well.
I have bypassed the “emotional” points intentionally. It seems vaccinating previously infected could be measured for existing immunity, but that might be less cost/benefit than taking the shot, regardless.
Comment