So I've been racking my brain over this for some time and now that there's a forum or place for me to bounce ideas off people, I was hoping I could get some feedback and have people weigh in on their experiences with an S-Corp and the associated 1099 income.
My current situation is I have a regular 9-5 job that pays $200,00/year (of which I defer 18k into a 401k). I also have a consulting job and I I lecture occasionally, which provides approximately $200,000 of 1099 income that goes into my S-corp. Since I'm setup as an S-corp, all the 1099 income gets deposited in the S-corp, and I pay myself a reasonable salary every year (120,000/year). Since I have a Solo 401K setup as part of the S-corp, my understanding is that I can only contribute a maximum of 25% of my salary into that 401k (which I'm currently contributing at $30,000/year as part of profit-sharing).
Now that the financials are laid out, here's the question. Is it better to:
A. Increase my salary (from 120k to 150k) from my S-corp so that I can contribute a higher amount into my solo 401k (but also will be forced to pay more in self employment/payroll taxes) i.e - Retirement contribution goes from profit sharing of $30,000/yr to $37,500/yr, but taxes also increase because I'm making more
or
B. Take less salary (say $50,000), contribute only $12,500 to the profit sharing portion of the 401k, and take the rest of the money as a distribution. i.e - pay less self employment taxes, contribute less to a 401k, but take more money home as a K-1 distribution
I've tried working out the numbers and the way I calculated it, I believe it was better to pay myself the higher salary, but for some reason, I keep doubting this because it just doesn't seem right to me. Is anyone else in a similar situation? What do you think would be the best way to handle this so that you pay the least amount of taxes in the long run.
My current situation is I have a regular 9-5 job that pays $200,00/year (of which I defer 18k into a 401k). I also have a consulting job and I I lecture occasionally, which provides approximately $200,000 of 1099 income that goes into my S-corp. Since I'm setup as an S-corp, all the 1099 income gets deposited in the S-corp, and I pay myself a reasonable salary every year (120,000/year). Since I have a Solo 401K setup as part of the S-corp, my understanding is that I can only contribute a maximum of 25% of my salary into that 401k (which I'm currently contributing at $30,000/year as part of profit-sharing).
Now that the financials are laid out, here's the question. Is it better to:
A. Increase my salary (from 120k to 150k) from my S-corp so that I can contribute a higher amount into my solo 401k (but also will be forced to pay more in self employment/payroll taxes) i.e - Retirement contribution goes from profit sharing of $30,000/yr to $37,500/yr, but taxes also increase because I'm making more
or
B. Take less salary (say $50,000), contribute only $12,500 to the profit sharing portion of the 401k, and take the rest of the money as a distribution. i.e - pay less self employment taxes, contribute less to a 401k, but take more money home as a K-1 distribution
I've tried working out the numbers and the way I calculated it, I believe it was better to pay myself the higher salary, but for some reason, I keep doubting this because it just doesn't seem right to me. Is anyone else in a similar situation? What do you think would be the best way to handle this so that you pay the least amount of taxes in the long run.
Comment