Be familiar with the asset protection laws of the state you practice in. Typically, retirement accounts are protected from lawsuits. However, some states make IRAs vulnerable (as opposed to 401Ks, 403bs) after certain contribution limits (e.g. the first $20,000 is safe, but then any amount over that can be seized). A “roll over IRA” is safe if it comes from a previous 401K or 403b plan. I suspect that if you theoretically lost a lawsuit that was not entirely covered by your insurance, then your attorney could make the successful argument that your “traditional IRA” was actually a “roll over IRA” for asset protection purposes. All of this is very remote, but there is an asset protection benefit in some states between a “roll over IRA” and “customary traditional/ROTH IRA”
Not necessarily.
Rolled over IRA assets do retain the unlimited federal bankruptcy protection, whereas the protection of IRA contributions is limited to $1M inflation adjusted from 2005 for all traditional and Roth IRA accounts combined.
However, neither receive ERISA anti-alienation protection against creditors outside of bankruptcy. That is subject to state law and about 10% of states do not fully protect them.
CA, limits IRA protection only to "the extent necessary to provide for the support of the judgment debtor when the judgment debtor retires and for the support of the spouse and dependents of the judgment debtor." Note: The court gets to decide what lifestyle that "support" needs to enable and not the lifestyle you have become adjusted to or planned to retire to.
Leave a comment: