In my mind it is most important to discuss the clinical aspects of the job and the practice philosophy first to see if that is a fit. There is no point in discussing compensation and paid time off if you are not a match in terms of practice style and philosophy. When we are interviewing candidates for our group, it is a huge turn off when the first question asked is about pay. It is way more important that the practice style is a good fit. Who cares if the compensation package is good if you are going to be miserable practicing with someone who has a different practice philosophy.
A doc in our group recently left for a slightly better pay package elsewhere. After a few short months, she was right back to us asking for her old job back. She says she loves the way our group emphasizes patient care as our first priority, and that we focus on our collective success as a group, on working together, on supporting one another, on creating a culture of caring for patients and for colleagues. The daily satisfaction I get by working with a group that shares my practice philosophy is worth so much more than a couple of extra bucks. Everyone in our group is very highly compensated anyway. That is a given.
It shouldnt be, this is business. That idea overall, is pretty dumb. If you’re pay is 10% of standard, I dont care what your practice model or philosophy is, Im not taking your job. Pretending it isnt near the unanimous number one priority for everyone is a huge mistake. There are thresholds where you wont work at the best places if they dont pay enough and where you’d work for the devil if pay was enough.
Obviously, you’re not talking about such a discrepancy, but you have to realize how important it is and the pressure a recent grad may be feeling (real or imagined). Every position says they have as great environment and its impossible to tell what bs and whats true until you’ve done it a while. Its a great idea but very difficult to know in advance.
Its just a typical doctor attitude that isnt representative of the rest of the working world, and everyone should be less sensitive about it. Its really a continuation of the taboo to talk about money as a physician mindset that has hampered so many. Playing coy and acting as if anyone is truly hearing, understanding, or caring at all about your practice pitch without a hint of pay/benefits is just kidding themselves.
Now, you’re practice and philosophy sound great, and was caricaturized for example purposes only.
If you can suffer through residency you can suffer through a bad culture if the pay is significantly better. Stack it up and move on.
Zaphod, I am talking about small differences in pay. Our practice likely pays around the 65th to 75th percentile for our area and specialty. But in my opinion we really do have a better culture than 90% of the practices out there. Is it worth it to join a toxic practice for 5% more pay? I don't think so. Being happy with your group and your colleagues is way more important than a small difference in pay.
Comment