Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WFH Radiology, help with $/wRVU

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turf Doc
    replied
    Originally posted by jacoavlu View Post

    maybe, i don’t know, not really the point

    the point is that “going market rates” is basically the commodity floor rate unless group is desperate or has unique needs

    you want to work for my group or most my neighbors and your not on site and not doing IR and not going to meetings it doesn’t really matter your qualifications it doesn’t make sense for me to pay you more than nighthawk and i don’t pay them very much certainly a lot less than i pay non partner employees
    definitely makes sense. obviously a big paycut to read in your underwear. guessing it works best for people who are in areas where there maybe aren't good PPs around and they're very fast readers so they just make up the poor $/rvu in volume

    im interested in rads and think telerad is a nice option to have since i have no clue how the corp landscape will look in 10 years plus im likely not going to live in a flyover state.

    Leave a comment:


  • jacoavlu
    replied
    Originally posted by Turf Doc View Post

    but if the alternative is working for the nighthawk he should still come out ahead right? because you cut out the middle man. plus if the nighthawk has given referrers a pain in anyway might be nicer to have it in house plus keep corp out of the picture altogether if you're concerned about losing contracts
    maybe, i don’t know, not really the point

    the point is that “going market rates” is basically the commodity floor rate unless group is desperate or has unique needs

    you want to work for my group or most my neighbors and your not on site and not doing IR and not going to meetings it doesn’t really matter your qualifications it doesn’t make sense for me to pay you more than nighthawk and i don’t pay them very much certainly a lot less than i pay non partner employees

    Leave a comment:


  • Turf Doc
    replied
    Originally posted by jacoavlu View Post

    nope. opposite

    the problem is radiology reads are basically seen as a commodity right or wrong - if you’re just a name on paper then you don’t add much value to the group over and above whatever the lowest rate is out there

    every situation unique of course. a desperate group could pay more. but in my region if you’re just a 1099 contractor then you’re likely not gonna get more than what i pay nighthawk
    but if the alternative is working for the nighthawk he should still come out ahead right? because you cut out the middle man. plus if the nighthawk has given referrers a pain in anyway might be nicer to have it in house plus keep corp out of the picture altogether if you're concerned about losing contracts

    Leave a comment:


  • jacoavlu
    replied
    Originally posted by Zaphod View Post
    Needs to be higher than an employed position since you're not receiving any benefits.
    nope. opposite

    the problem is radiology reads are basically seen as a commodity right or wrong - if you’re just a name on paper then you don’t add much value to the group over and above whatever the lowest rate is out there

    every situation unique of course. a desperate group could pay more. but in my region if you’re just a 1099 contractor then you’re likely not gonna get more than what i pay nighthawk

    Leave a comment:


  • FreudianSlippers
    replied
    Median was $57/wRVU in 2017 for radiology.

    http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-s...ractor_sec.pdf

    Leave a comment:


  • goldenchimpy
    replied
    To come up with a fair price per rvu you need to know the overall breakdown of cases. Straight forward ED cases is much different from staging ct cap with multiple priors. You might want to check out auntminnie as they have a bunch of discussions on this topic. Also you covering malpractice is not typical in my region and would be just about a deal breaker for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • zlandar
    replied
    Do you and the practice have an agreed-upon list of studies with wRVU? How and when will this data be available to calculate your pay? How about the time and amount of exams per shift?

    if the wRVU is being generated on the PACS or voice recognition software that is a fast and reliable method. If you are relying on the practice's billing company that is a potential cluster.

    Interesting you are covering malpractice. Have you already received a quote from your malpractice carrier including the cost of the tail?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zaphod
    replied
    Needs to be higher than an employed position since you're not receiving any benefits.

    Leave a comment:


  • GoBlueMD
    replied
    Large range and not really region dependent. The higher the volume available, the lower the pay/case it seems. Someone usually bites.

    If you negotiate directly with practices, you will get a better rate compared with using corporate groups. The rate will still be less than Medicare rate of ~40/wrvu or whatever it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • pslfhopeful
    started a topic WFH Radiology, help with $/wRVU

    WFH Radiology, help with $/wRVU

    Hi everyone,

    I'm negotiating with a local private practice to assist with their volumes as a 1099 and we have decided on a $/wRVU model to align both interests the best. Malpractice is covered by me. This is a side gig and my main W2 employer salary exceeds social security annual tax threshold.

    Any radiologists out there with a sense of going market rates of $/RVU? If so, can you please put your region of the country.
Working...
X