As mentioned, there is the efficiency of the billing practice which impacts you AND the “owner”. I call it owner because of the potential for there to be profits diverted outside the partnership. That is perfectly ethical mechanism to reap the benefits of the risk and work in building a successful group. The question is whether the percentage is fair. Owner and partners will benefit in any improvements in collections. No resistance there.
The second issue is developing your own practice.
Advantage is with the partnership since the “owners” take is all based on percentages with the partners. The only risk is the “associates profit/loss. Even that is kindly shared by the other partners. The “owner” has only exposure to his/her partnership share. You are correct, a 4 physician office could open across the street from your new private practice.
A local cal hardware store has difficulty competing with Home Depot.
Build your business plan is the only way you will have numbers and a time frame to compare.
The second issue is developing your own practice.
Advantage is with the partnership since the “owners” take is all based on percentages with the partners. The only risk is the “associates profit/loss. Even that is kindly shared by the other partners. The “owner” has only exposure to his/her partnership share. You are correct, a 4 physician office could open across the street from your new private practice.
A local cal hardware store has difficulty competing with Home Depot.
Build your business plan is the only way you will have numbers and a time frame to compare.
Comment