Originally posted by sealion1
View Post
X
-
Originally posted by F0017S0 View Post
What do you do if your nanny won’t accept a reasonable cost cut? Go back onto the open market or maybe have the oldest help out with care duties (commensurate with age, of course)?
A reliable nanny who knows your family and kids is too valuable to give up over nickels and dimes.
But for her, it may mean instead of earning 70K, 65K, 60K, 55K over the next 4 years commiserate with fewer responsibilities and more downtime during the day, she'll earn 70K for next 2 years then have to find new employment when we make an earlier transition. Which may start her at a lower salary with less kind employers anyways.
Comment
-
Originally posted by F0017S0 View Post
The sheer magnitude of a single, early life line item of early childhood eclipses the median income for the entire country. That is mind boggling, to say the least. For OP, yes, it doesn’t really “matter” (financially) the large cost because it keeps OP and spouse in the high income jobs longer. Absolutely brutal, nevertheless…
Comment
-
Originally posted by Turf Doc View Post
As WCI said earlier in the thread, it seems like it either makes sense to pay it out and earn at a higher level or one spouse effectively takes a 70k post-tax "job" staying at home. So i guess theres always one option that makes sense?
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by F0017S0 View Post
What do you do if your nanny won’t accept a reasonable cost cut? Go back onto the open market or maybe have the oldest help out with care duties (commensurate with age, of course)?
Money wise, she decided it was worth investing time in her kids. Our daycare was free! She worked until she thought her aunt wasn’t capable.
Family decision, not just money. OP can afford it.
My guess is the “nanny” would be willing to take on more things. House manager, property manager, cooking and shopping etc. Much of that depends on her family situation. WBD’s nanny is still hanging around and he has grandchildren.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tim View PostActually, spouse became SAH until the oldest could drive. The reason was not that even though childcare need decreased, the kids school and activities increased. Very formative years.
Money wise, she decided it was worth investing time in her kids. Our daycare was free! She worked until she thought her aunt wasn’t capable.
Family decision, not just money. OP can afford it.
My guess is the “nanny” would be willing to take on more things. House manager, property manager, cooking and shopping etc. Much of that depends on her family situation. WBD’s nanny is still hanging around and he has grandchildren.
Comment
-
VLCOL area, and we pay just under 10K for 2 kids in daycare, typically 8AM-4:30PM. We are uber-lucky to have gotten a spot in a non-profit that is partly subsidized by grants from the state and partly by donations. And we give generous end of year tip and donate to the non-profit for this and other causes them sponsor in order to give back. Thinking about an Au-pair or (more likely) a distant relative like a second-cousin to come in for a year to do community college and help with language skills (a 2-way street) on the side.
Comment
-
HCOL area and we pay our nanny $26/hour plus a stipend for health insurance. We guarantee forty hours even though she only works thirty. She's not a great nanny (does no child-related household tasks), but she always shows up for work, and we need her as back-up for when one of our three kids is sick. Overall we probably spend $100,000 year on childcare/school. No family help ever. The surviving grandparents have no interest.
We're planning to move later this year to get a better set-up for an au pair and send all kids to public school when they're old enough. We just cannot afford our current situation with our combined income ($300,000 a year; I work part-time since spouse has a low-paying but demanding job).
Yes, I feel like the childcare expenses are absolutely nuts. Public school is now our top priority because I think we will need a nanny or au pair indefinitely to make things work without any family help.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by sealion1 View Post
I'm hoping to negotiate and cut costs back once kids get older. Our nanny is amazing and worth her weight in gold. But my wife and I also work very hard to be good employers. I'm hoping goodwill on both sides will lead to reasonable cost cuts once children start reaching school age and her responsibilities decrease. Hopefully she will be willing to accept pay cut for less work but a good reliable job/kind employers.
If you cut her income even for reduced work, she will start looking for another job that pays the same or more. And she'll likely find it. It's probably not worth it to you to cut her salary by $10k, which is nothing to you, but a lot to her. And as you said above, "our nanny is worth her weight in gold." So either she weighs nothing or you don't know how much gold is worth.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by JWeb View Post
Are you willing to take a paycut?
If you cut her income even for reduced work, she will start looking for another job that pays the same or more. And she'll likely find it. It's probably not worth it to you to cut her salary by $10k, which is nothing to you, but a lot to her. And as you said above, "our nanny is worth her weight in gold." So either she weighs nothing or you don't know how much gold is worth.
I'm envisioning a situation for myself where all the kids are in school. Is it worth paying 70K for someone who really just helps us get the kids to school, watches them for 1-2 hrs after school, and gives us some added flexibility? I'm not sure.
Would she be willing to take a 20K paycut if her job changes from full on 3 toddlers for 9 hrs/day to 3hrs a day of work then spending the rest of the time sitting around in a nice house? Maybe?
Comment
-
Originally posted by sealion1 View Post
I didnt start the thread, so I'm in a different situation than the OP
I'm envisioning a situation for myself where all the kids are in school. Is it worth paying 70K for someone who really just helps us get the kids to school, watches them for 1-2 hrs after school, and gives us some added flexibility? I'm not sure.
Would she be willing to take a 20K paycut if her job changes from full on 3 toddlers for 9 hrs/day to 3hrs a day of work then spending the rest of the time sitting around in a nice house? Maybe?
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by wideopenspaces View Post
I prefer sending my children to the mines so I don't have to supervise them or otherwise be around them all day.Last edited by F0017S0; 01-17-2023, 04:48 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by sealion1 View Post
I didnt start the thread, so I'm in a different situation than the OP
I'm envisioning a situation for myself where all the kids are in school. Is it worth paying 70K for someone who really just helps us get the kids to school, watches them for 1-2 hrs after school, and gives us some added flexibility? I'm not sure.
Would she be willing to take a 20K paycut if her job changes from full on 3 toddlers for 9 hrs/day to 3hrs a day of work then spending the rest of the time sitting around in a nice house? Maybe?
Our nanny was worried we were going to consider paying her less next August when our youngest goes to preschool for 6 hours a week. We chuckled, and were like, heck no.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by StarTrekDoc View PostHeyAnesthesia . Some folk childcare is 50%+ and could take up much of discretionary spend. Kids by far are more expensive than anything...even mortgage in many cases.
- Likes 1
Comment
Channels
Collapse
Comment