We went through this and ended up not buying. We love the community, go there every year. Renting for a week is expensive by our standards but far cheaper than a purchase. It would take many lifetimes to break even.
Agents loved to claim that one could make enough on rentals to cover the annual costa. But they were vague to the point of useless about what proportion of the time one could expect the unit to be rented or how much to charge.
We did not want to be landlords, deal with tenants, deal with a property management company. Our jobs would make it out of the question to go as often a once a month. Our weekends are busy and we could not go their often on the weekends. Counting, maybe, 3 weekends a year and one week, it made no sense.
That would have left a lot of time for rental, but we did not want to own or deal with a rental.
Fortunately for us, they rejected our offer and we did not increase it.
So now we go somewhere in that area for a week a year. We make a reservation, spend a pleasant week, and for 51 weeks per year we can ignore the entire area.
No worries about rental, maintenance, property company, flooding, or anything else.
If you can go often enough to make it worth dealing with and if you do not need the rental income, then it could be useful. The friends of ours who have second homes do not rent them out. When neither they nor relatives are using them, they sit empty. I do not know what arrangements they make for someone to check on the places. Even that pattern would be more hassle than we would want.
As it is if we decide to vacation somewhere else, we would have nothing holding us to this particular place. If there were a flood caused by rising sea levels or a big storm. If the town lost power due to such an event. If the roof were damaged by a storm or fallen tree. If anything else happened, we would shrug, say "That is a shame" and go on with our lives. To us, that is vacation. Owning two properties is not something we would want.
Agents loved to claim that one could make enough on rentals to cover the annual costa. But they were vague to the point of useless about what proportion of the time one could expect the unit to be rented or how much to charge.
We did not want to be landlords, deal with tenants, deal with a property management company. Our jobs would make it out of the question to go as often a once a month. Our weekends are busy and we could not go their often on the weekends. Counting, maybe, 3 weekends a year and one week, it made no sense.
That would have left a lot of time for rental, but we did not want to own or deal with a rental.
Fortunately for us, they rejected our offer and we did not increase it.
So now we go somewhere in that area for a week a year. We make a reservation, spend a pleasant week, and for 51 weeks per year we can ignore the entire area.
No worries about rental, maintenance, property company, flooding, or anything else.
If you can go often enough to make it worth dealing with and if you do not need the rental income, then it could be useful. The friends of ours who have second homes do not rent them out. When neither they nor relatives are using them, they sit empty. I do not know what arrangements they make for someone to check on the places. Even that pattern would be more hassle than we would want.
As it is if we decide to vacation somewhere else, we would have nothing holding us to this particular place. If there were a flood caused by rising sea levels or a big storm. If the town lost power due to such an event. If the roof were damaged by a storm or fallen tree. If anything else happened, we would shrug, say "That is a shame" and go on with our lives. To us, that is vacation. Owning two properties is not something we would want.
Comment