I
I think the majority of people who seek to be a part of this sort of venture have to be OK with the fact that they are providing patients with mediocre care. Learning how to do botox, fillers, some basic laser procedures, etc. is not exactly rocket science. But the fact of the matter is that there are plenty of people who are formally trained in these procedures who just have a much deeper understanding of them (especially with respect to managing unexpected complications) and are just better at them. In a perfect world, I don’t think I’d have a real problem if each patient who went to such a place had a full understanding of the level of expertise they were receiving relative to what is widely available. Most patients would still accept inferior care for significant cost savings. The problem is that plenty of patients think they are receiving the same level of care at lower cost. The main contributor to that problem is the fact that most of the docs that are involved in running these places wrongly believe that too. I’m absolutely not saying that a family practitioner, for example, couldn’t become highly proficient at these procedures. It certainly is possible. But I think doing so requires a lot more cost and effort in educating themselves than most of them actually do.
Too easy to skate by on mediocre results, which is sadly true for augs as well. Issue with anything like this that is the thresholds. “okay” results come at very minimal experience/knowledge, excellent and awesome results as well as managing issues is much much harder. Most docs dont like it and are having their nursing staff do most of these anyways so even more so. Some are absolutely amazing, some are scary.
I agree it's easy to be successful with mediocre results. The point was it takes a certain lack of professionalism to provide those mediocre results even at a profit. That's not a problem for many people but I would imagine it is for some.
.
Here's an analogy that most people here could relate to. Take whatever type of medicine you practice and imagine that there would be a way to get paid more but to do that you would have to provide care that you know is worse. It's not bad enough to significantly increase your risk of a lawsuit (and assume you would be more than compensated for the risk), but *you* know it's worse. Also assume that, for the most part, not even your patients can tell the difference. Would you do it? I'm pretty sure a lot of people wouldn't, even if they would successfully make more money.
Leave a comment: